<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 24 &#124; Delete, Rant, Disappear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pushmyfollow.com/2009/10/episode-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pushmyfollow.com/2009/10/episode-24/</link>
	<description>A podcast about social media and other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erin White</title>
		<link>http://pushmyfollow.com/2009/10/episode-24/comment-page-1/#comment-3309</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pushmyfollow.com/?p=185#comment-3309</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Amazon thing and not using the author&#039;s name - if I&#039;m reading this correctly, it sounds like the terms of service indicate that they reserve the RIGHT to use the author&#039;s name, but it does not sound like they are OBLIGATED to use the author&#039;s name.  It might sound like a split hair, but that&#039;s how I&#039;m reading it.

That being said, I agree it sucks to use people&#039;s content and not at least attribute it.  They&#039;re getting it for free; the least they can do is throw the author a bone.  It would not cost them a thing to do so.

*~*~*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Amazon thing and not using the author&#8217;s name &#8211; if I&#8217;m reading this correctly, it sounds like the terms of service indicate that they reserve the RIGHT to use the author&#8217;s name, but it does not sound like they are OBLIGATED to use the author&#8217;s name.  It might sound like a split hair, but that&#8217;s how I&#8217;m reading it.</p>
<p>That being said, I agree it sucks to use people&#8217;s content and not at least attribute it.  They&#8217;re getting it for free; the least they can do is throw the author a bone.  It would not cost them a thing to do so.</p>
<p>*~*~*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Giltner</title>
		<link>http://pushmyfollow.com/2009/10/episode-24/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Giltner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pushmyfollow.com/?p=185#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>Great podcast.  (found it from Sarah&#039;s twitter account).  Loved the diss of Tony R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great podcast.  (found it from Sarah&#8217;s twitter account).  Loved the diss of Tony R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
